Risk Management Tips for Insurance Agents During Catastrophe (CAT) Season
|
In recent years, catastrophic weather events have continued to increase in frequency and severity. While past hurricanes have highlighted recurring coverage misconceptions, today’s market environment presents an even greater challenge for insurance agents: proactively managing client expectations before a loss occurs while maintaining strong E&O defensibility. Hurricanes and other CAT events consistently expose gaps in coverage, misunderstandings about policy provisions, and breakdowns in communication. These issues can quickly evolve into uninsured losses – and ultimately, E&O claims against the agent. The following risk management tips are designed to help insurance professionals strengthen their processes before and during CAT season. Address Coverage Gaps Before the Storm Forms Standard property policies generally exclude flood damage, and many insureds only become aware of this limitation after a loss occurs. Plus, insureds often attempt to secure coverage only after a storm is imminent, not realizing that flood policies typically include waiting periods before coverage becomes effective. Risk Management Tips:
Set Clear Expectations Around Coverage Limitations For example, flood policies may apply separate deductibles for building and contents, which can surprise policyholders at claim time. Risk Management Tips:
Document Every Coverage Conversation In several claim scenarios, agencies faced significant E&O exposure when they could not demonstrate that flood coverage or higher limits had been offered or declined. Risk Management Tips:
Documentation is often the primary defense when coverage disputes arise. Considerations at Renewal Time Risk Management Tips:
Proactive Communication, Consistent Documentation, and Clear Expectation-Setting Helping insureds understand their exposures – and their options – before a loss occurs remains one of the most effective risk management strategies available to insurance professionals. Loss Examples Failure to place flood coverage. The insured was a long-term agency customer operating a retail shop written on a Businessowners Policy (BOP). The hurricane caused flood damage to the insured's rented store, resulting in contents and inventory damage. The carrier declined the claim, and the insured sued the agency for failure to offer flood coverage. The agency did not document their file that flood coverage was offered/declined, resulting in in a $325,000 E&O claim with an additional $145,000 of loss adjustment expenses. Failure to offer excess flood coverage. The agency placed an NFIP flood policy for homeowners that were insured with a $250,000 building limit. The agent recalled verbally offering excess flood coverage, but did not document the file. The agency's website proclaimed that they are "Flood Experts," having been named "Agency of the Year" at the National Flood Conference. A hurricane destroyed the home, and the NFIP policy paid the full limits. The insured sued the agency for failure to recommend and place excess flood coverage, resulting in a $195,000 E&O claim with an additional $45,000 of loss adjustment expenses. |


